Holdfast Training Services Trial Blog

Took some leave while the kids were here and took the opportunity to visit Washington DC and Baltimore to see the museums and monuments etc. Apparently we’re still just as embarrassing to the kids as ever. Lukas is now home safe and we pack Adi off tomorrow so that naked house can resume.

HQ PROJECT

The design has been out with the contractors for a while and bids have been received. They are to be assessed on value engineering criteria as well as price but there has been a large number of RFI’s submitted that need to be answered. The majority are to do with geotechnical issues and uncertainties with the piling requirements. We have a group called Geotech within USACE who did the original design and a lot of the cross-issues that related to contractual issues have been ironed out. The next step will be to consolidate the RFI’s and distribute and release ammendments to specifications and drawings to ensure that the contractors have an opportunity to revise their submissions before the final award is released.

Key issue at the minute is that the original specification stated ‘no blasting’ for the foundations etc but on a subsequent issue the wrong document specification was adjusted and released. This had 5 pages of specs on how blasting will take place. The facility big wigs are not willing to allow blasting to take place as we are near to a live airfield and family housing and the use of the work ‘explosives’ seem to make them jumpy. We have arranged a meeting for next monday to try and convince them that we can actually blast without knocking aeroplanes out of the sky or killing small children. The main reason for this is that the project is likely to suffer to the tune of $2M if we now deny the contractors this method of removing rock.

ASHLEY RESERVIST CENTRE

More developments with insufficient quality control with concrete pours on behalf of the contractor. USACE now needs to work out if they make the contractor rip out existing sections and re-pour and how the contractor can begin to rectify their actions. Am considering offering my services to look back though the records and come up with proposals for how we proceed with minimal impact to the project. (request advice from PEW staff as to whether this is a browny point scoring opportunity for review.)

There are also issues with the proposed method of nailing ceiling boards to corrugated steel sheets…..apparently nails don’t go through corrugated steel too well. I immediately started to try and come up with various suggestions on how we could overcome this, but this is a big no no. USACE avoids at all cost telling the contractor how he should do something because if this subsequently turns out to be a problem, they have no comeback, whereas if the contractor submits a proposal and USACE agrees to HIS proposal, the contractor still carries the risk. I am now potentially in a bizarre situation where I can suggest ideas to the contractor, who would then have to suggest them back to me, so that I might approve them……I’m sure there’s a catch somewhere in there!

SOLARWALL PROJECT

I have also been getting my head around the Solar Wall project on building 2001 here on the base. We had some RFI’s for structural as built drawings for the racking systems inside the warehouse (as they support the roof) and also for wall construction details so that the structural engineers can demonstrate that the existing walls can support the solarwall product. This was initially passed to the Client (Defence Logistics Agency) as they actually hold all drawings pertaining to the facility. The structural engineers are not content that they have sufficient information from the older sections of the building and want to work from ‘assumptions’. The Client is not willing to spend more time looking through their historical records (as they have spent many hours already and are busy). The structural engineers are unwilling to send someone in person to look for additional drawings as they are in Texas and the Client is now understandably peeved.

I have been discussing other hierarchy issues and have been trying to understand where various responsibilities lie and where different bucks stop. In the end I still get the ‘shared responsibility’ line and have decided that I will push all matters but in consultation with the others before addressing the contractors direct. Ultimately I wouldn’t be willing to allow the design to be ‘proven’ with such vague assumptions and will insist on some additional action on behalf of the structural engineer (SE). In the spirit of mutual cooperation I will arrange for myself and another project engineer to try and tackle the drawings issue provided the SE sends a local representative to assist. I will also investigate the feasibility of removing existing wall sections to see how they were built. If this turns out to be a 10 man and a crane type of job then it’s probably too much effort. If it’s 2 men and a screwdriver then the SE can get his rep down here pronto….especially seeing as the total value of this is $3.8M and it would be unwise to allow him to carry such risk. I have held a separate meeting with the client to get him to confirm that he will be willing to assist in any reasonable way with the removal of existing wall panels. This meeting also revealed that the Client has undertaken a similar project previously but without the assistance of USACE as the dollar value was below the threshold. This means we now must extract as much history and lessons learned as possible. If this were a civilian client this would not be a problem because it’s in their best interests from a financial point of view, but for a government agency as a Client, this is less of a concern because the money is not theirs and for them it is good to be able to offload the responsibility to a third party.

Other developments include refining of the submission requirements and that some initial submittal requirements can be deleted all together. These are things such as environmental assessments and historical building impacts. The whole project is aimed at improving energy efficiency and by definition it is a inappropriate to try and justify or score points in a discrete manner. The whole thing is a big tick in the box so no further work is required. Historically the building is deemed by the client to have no significance and therefore no heritage is affected. My next step will be to press the contractor for a revised schedule and to highlight key areas that need lead times and also to tie in the schedule with his submittal requirements.

IN CAR COMMUTING ACTIVITIES

Tried to see if the telephone messaging option for blogging would allow me to save time and make better use of the daily commute….it is not recommended. I will stick to e-mail to update blogging.

My dead animal road kill observational skills are improving. I can now readily identify rabbits, foxes, skunks and possums. I am unsure about a particularly chubby looking thing that might be a Marmot of some sort. Will have to wait until another one dies as they don’t age well in the highway.

Mr Country and Western singer man is starting to get to me now. Today he sang about how he can leave his door unlocked and how cool it is to drive a pickup truck (and actually have a use for it – unlike the city folk). Yesterday he was unhappy because because his wife left him (assuming it’s his wife – he referred to her as ‘my girl’) but at least his faithful dog is still with him. A while back he was actually happy because he got some sort of new tractor but I assume ‘his girl’ has left with the tractor as he was particularly miserable about the whole affair. I normally get through about half a song before I have to turn it off – I am afraid I may build up a tolerance to country music….and that’s not cool.

AND IN OTHER NEWS

I am now the proud owner of a Maryland driver’s licence having gone through the indignity of having to take my test again. It took all I had to mask the bad habits picked up over the years. The worst bit was trying to pretend I knew where the wind-screen wiper controls were in the wife’s car when it started raining during the test. The examiner probably wondered why I kept switching the over-drive on and off, but hey, it’s not a fail criteria. The whole thing did almost came to an unceremonious end when prior to the test I presented the clerk with my 3-hour drug and alcohol awareness certificate (framed) and she realised the contempt I hold for the whole system. She’s clearly very proud of their bureaucracy.

Until next time.

McFry