Archive
Technology merging with health and safety.
Site Two Fifty One
Technology merging with health and safety.
This week I attended the Laing O’Rourke “Mission Zero – Ask the Question” workshop. This is the Laing O’Rourke mandatory health and safety briefing which aims to get their staff to work safely on projects. It is a pretty decent attempt at raising awareness of health and safety in the workplace and potential pitfalls when working on projects. Impressively, Laing O’Rourke has produced a short film illustrating an accident on one of their sites (early removal of back-propping causing a slab collapse). The film is relevant and applicable to many sites, raising multiple issues and creates an excellent scenario for discussion. The real focus of the workshop was not to teach employees about health and safety, but simply get people asking the question to ensure activities are done safely.
Later in the week I attended Priority 1 training. Perhaps familiar to some, but likely not all, this is an online tool to enable snagging, permits, tasks and observations to be recorded electronically and geographically. The software aims to “improve the way that information is collected, managed and reported within live construction projects”. The example I will cite is based on the Health, Safety and Environment Supervisors’ check I do weekly. One of the items I check is edge protection. If I find a missing toe board, I then raise an action. I take a photo, fill out a short form and assign a date and organisation to resolve the problem. You might say what is wrong with a paper form and telling the site foreman to sort it. That method works but it fails to record trends and give the project leader timely feedback on issues that have arisen. Moreover, the snagging tool allows tasks to be assigned to a variety of sub-contractors which can then be monitored for their progress and have records kept with the photograph/location data acting as evidence of performance. It’s a good tool and probably has lots of other useful functions which I expect will become apparent soon (issuing of permits for example).
This week, a PowerPoint brief was issued for delivery on-site to highlight recent issues across multiple Laing O’Rourke sites. Good information sharing and method of learning from others’ mistakes. Especially applicable as we do all of these activities!

Tipper wagon overturned due to unsuitable ground conditions – wagon should not have gone onto area in question.

The area being rolled was sloping to the left. This should have been levelled out prior to and during the backfilling operation.
Military – Civilian Processes
I thought I would look at a few checks/processes in the world of construction I think the military do well at based on my experience of the civil industry. The people/checks/processes are all present/done on civilian construction sites and it really has reinforced the good old Troop Commanders’ checks being vital to keep a project running. Not just with counting spanners but the checks to ensure the equipment is serviceable (PA test in date and item functions).
QM in charge of materials and logistics
SQMS to make the logistical chain
G1098 storeman
Lifting tackle register
Tp Comd monthly checks
Equipment Care Inspections
Complete tool boxes for tradesmen
SHEF statements
Section composition (section comd and 2ic with tradesmen)
First parade checks
Whole Fleet Management
Risk registers
Fire NCOs
Tool box talks
Orders process
My site is at an early stage and so effectively lacks a bit of section comd leadership. It has some good quality tradesmen but a lack leadership skills are to be found on-site. I know on more advanced projects lots of these things (G4, material requisition, health and safety provision) just happen but in my case, I (we) are establishing the safe systems of work. I would like to say it is a bit of a pain, but actually I am learning a lot from it and think I will learn more from a maturing system, rather than a mature system.

