Home > Uncategorized > Any risk of a contract?

Any risk of a contract?

Background:

  • Heathrow Airport use an overarching Framework Agreement (bespoke contract: target price, similar to NEC Option C) with a principle contractor (Mitie) for the supply of services.
  • I am working within the Energy Demand Management Team that looks for one-off opportunities to employ novel technologies (energy efficient lighting, intelligent air-con control etc.) to make financial savings.
  • These one-off works make use of a Works Package clause within the framework contract, where the contractor can be set to work under a simple Purchase Order (PO) agreement.
  • These agreements follow the form of a fixed-price (NEC OptA) as they as it has been the simplest at the outset to manage. Although still subject to many of the payment and H&S clauses of the framework contract, there is no contractual obligation for submission of a works programme (by the contractor) or detailed project deliverables (by the client) beyond the scope that is given in the PO.

The potential problem:

  • Although the projects are relatively small (6-10 weeks and typically less than £100,000) I think there still exists significant risk for both parties should there be time or financial issues.
  • There already exists a good working relationship between the Client and Contractor but in this uncertain environment where the bean counters have most of the say, there may be cause for friction.

Where I come in:

I gather that it is probably rare to be given so much scope in an organisation! I am keen to play with different options and tailor the contract based on the scope definition of the individual work package and my own (and boss’) personal willingness for risk and admin. I am told I have the option to change the commercial model as per my requirement in any specific work package. I could specify any of Fixed Price (OptA), Target Price (OptC), Cost Reimbursement (OptE) or a combination of them.

Questions:

  • My initial thoughts are to formalise the existing client/contractor relationship and to head down an NEC OptA route using NEC Minor Works contract.
  • Has anybody else any experience of working with principle contractors on jobs of similar sizes/costs? Has there been any particularly good or bad experiences and what are the significant pitfalls to avoid?
  1. coneheadjim's avatar
    coneheadjim
    16/06/2020 at 2:05 pm

    Al, what types of jobs are being procured at the moment and where are the significant areas of risk in these tasks?

  2. alrickard's avatar
    alrickard
    16/06/2020 at 5:51 pm

    Jim,

    Within the Utilities and Energy Demand Team there has not been any new allocation of CAPEX since about mid-March. The projects that are ongoing at the moment are ones that would have been more financially painful to closedown (through return of stores to contracted logistic centre, reversal of temporary works, reversion of part-done works). These ongoing projects that have met this criteria that I’m aware of include: replacement of cooling tower filter medium, replacement of sodium lighting for LED boards, installation of electronically commutated fans in place of belt-driven centrifugal and UVC cooling coil disinfection. The last three of which I am overseeing.

    The key risks with the projects mentioned above seem to be all with the contractor as they have been set-up on a fixed price agreement. The client has not been any further out of pocket since calling a halt on other projects however there is CAPEX tied up in purchased equipment to the tune of about a million quid. There is no inherent shelf-life for these stores and so despite being a sunk cost there is no timeline that must be met.

    At the moment the mood music seems to be that CAPEX will be in pretty short supply for at least the remainder of this year. The small amounts that are available could prove as an opportunity to road-test a more formal contractual relationship with Mitie (in my own case).

  3. coneheadjim's avatar
    coneheadjim
    17/06/2020 at 6:04 pm

    What is the level of the complexity of the risks in this work Al?

    • alrickard's avatar
      alrickard
      17/06/2020 at 7:46 pm

      Jim. Talking specifically about the contracted works for the Energy Demand Management Teams and the risks that I can see with the few number of jobs that I’ve been allocated to see through to completion; the risks seem relatively low to the client and simple. There is now no risk of further costs and the deliverables of the projects are not time sensitive in the sense that no other stakeholders are waiting on benefits.

  4. coneheadjim's avatar
    coneheadjim
    17/06/2020 at 7:49 pm

    In which case the only way to get the cost down will be to take some of the risk back from the contractor. This is usually achieved by simplifying the design

  5. coneheadjim's avatar
    coneheadjim
    17/06/2020 at 7:50 pm

    Or lowering the quality requirements.

  6. 04/07/2020 at 11:33 am

    When I was working for Multiplex, only sub-contracts over £10m were Opt C – target cost, all others were Opt A – fixed price. I believe that the main reason for this is the more onerous QS work involved in Opt C, where to maintain the integrity of target price the cost must be very closely monitored.

  1. No trackbacks yet.

Leave a comment