Home > Uncategorized > RE Wall Upstream Walkway and Piezometer Installation; A simple task…

RE Wall Upstream Walkway and Piezometer Installation; A simple task…

 

The Reinforced Earth Wall (7.2 x 6.2 x 500m) that is currently being installed on top of the existing Earth & Rock-fill Dam also requires a small walkway on the upstream face.  This is required to allow for the inspection of the settlement points as well for monitoring the RE wall itself (panel verticality/movement and for extracting the internal galvanised test straps).

Chaffey Dam Upstream Face

DESIGN

EPSON MFP image

EPSON MFP image

EPSON MFP image

Joint Considerations

METHOD

  1. Placement of stabilised sand (100mm).  This was simply to provide a firm level surface for the L-Units to be placed upon as the large, angular 4B material produced an inconsistent surface level.  It also allowed the temporary handrail to be secured in placed.
  2. Installation of temporary fall prevention system/ handrail.
  3. Backfill of rock armour on upstream face.  Required to cover the stab-sand and improve aesthetics (..and durability)
  4. Installation of precast L-Units. (see photo 1).  Originally, designed to be gabion baskets, these precast units were favoured for aesthetic reasons.  The finish and uniformity of the units was flagged as being very low.
  5. Removal of temporary fall prevention system. (Design of fall restraint anchor required- see below)
  6. Core drilling of L-Units to allow piezometer conduit to pass.
  7. Piezometer marking/ protection.
  8. Installation of permanent handrail to top of L-Units.
  9. Backfill of precast concrete L-Units using large rock-fill material (Layer 1 (0.45m)).  Agreed upon by SPE due to large cobble aggregate to be used (20 – 75mm).
  10. Installation of plastic electrical pits.
  11. Further placement and compaction of backfill material (Layer 2 (0.45m)).
  12. Installation of pavement formwork, steel reinforcement, jointing, end stops.
  13. Construction of concrete pavement (310 x 1.6 x 0.1m).
 WP_20150924_014
CONSIDERATIONS
Concrete Placement.  32Mpa, 100mm slump concrete poured into 6m slabs with 2m c/c dummy joints and 20mm rigid joints.  Originally specified to be 2.5m slabs with 10mm joints for the full 310m walkway.  It is assessed that the small slab size was specified to allow for movement found within embankment dams and RE Walls.  However, an RFI was raised to increase the slab size from 2.5m to 6m lengths.  As the risk of cracking was therefore increased, dummy joints at 2m c/c were specified in order to control the crack locations.  It was also advised by the superintendent that I snip every other steel bar within the steel mesh to promote the crack induction.  This advice was not taken but in hind sight it may have been a reasonable suggestion.  Increasing the bay size served two purposes: 1) Buildability  2)  To align the joints of the walkway with those found in the vertical RE Wall panels.
Piezometers. At various locations within the dam, piezometers are permanently set deep within the earth and rock-fill dam in order to monitor internal pore pressures. It falls to JH to relocate the piezometer conduit vertically to the new walkway surface level and across to the bridge linking the dam and the morning glory spillway.
WP_20150924_011Piezo Key
Piezo Realignment.  With 7 x piezometer cables, it was critical to monitor which cable corresponded to which piezometer.  A simple coloured tape marking method was adopted as shown above.  Each piezometer cable was approximately 500m in length and had to be unwound, threaded through the electrical pit and 310m of white comms conduit before being and re-spooled.  Fortunately, as the electrical pits were simply formed using toughened plastic casing, I decided to attempt slicing one part-way open to allow it to slide it around the piezometer cable rather than threading it.  This trial paid off and saved the JH labour force a considerable amount of time and messing around in a congested working space.  Importantly, it prevent JH from delaying the Fusion team who were constructing the walkway. (Unfortunately, snipping and rejoining the cables was not an option according to our PM..)

Point Loading the RE Wall.  I assessed that the pumping of concrete from an unfinished RE Wall to a walkway 3m below was the greatest risk to this phase of construction.  A 36m pump would be positioned onto the RE Wall crest in order to pump 12 x 6m slabs/ day.  Each outrigger leg was rated up to 192 kN but with the walkway so close, it was assessed that this force was unlikely to be approached.  Upon receiving the concrete pump technical data, it at first appeared as though we would not have sufficient space (See image below).  Fortunately, this was not the case and it was able to safely operate simply using an alternative outrigger configuration.  The important dimension was that of the 1.5m exclusion zone from the internal face of the RE Wall within which the outrigger could not encroach.  This was likely due to the lack of frictional resistance offered by the steel strapping at such proximity to the RE Wall Face which prevents the vertical panels from pushing out.

Concrete Pump

Outrigger dimensions breach RE Wall exclusion zone

Outrigger dimensions breach RE Wall exclusion zone

Working at Height. Due to the steep upstream face, a temporary handrail was installed to provide a fall prevention system.  Once the L-Units were in place the temporary handrail was to be removed.  However, workers were required to wear harnesses for the removal of the handrail as it required them to step on the outside of the L-Units.

WP_20150902_002

Due to the lack of fixing points, I was required to design a fall restraint system.  M16 5.8 bolt was used with a small steel plate to provide an anchor point for harnesses.  The simple anchor design required external verification before it could be signed off.  A couple of hours later and the design was approved for immediate use.

Securing the L-Units. As part of the RECO L-Unit system, hot dip gal sheer keys are provided which meaure 1m in length.  These slot vertically in between each concrete unit and ensure that the individual units operate as a continuous structure, whilst allowing a certain degree of movement.  However, due to the subsequent placement and compaction of the cobble fill material between the RE Wall and the L-Units, I decided to pin them in place using 4 x steel rods as shown below.  This was to prevent the units moving laterally away from the RE Wall as compaction occurred.

WP_20150924_008WP_20150924_005

ISSUES

Piezometer Alignment. When initially setting out for the installation of the walkway, it soon became apparent that the piezometer alignment would conflict with the position of the precast concrete L-Units.  Consequently, 100mm holes had to be drilled through the precast units to allow the piezometer conduit to pass through.  As JH were also responsible for the location at which the piezometers rose vertically during prior groundworks (and before my arrival!) it was a simple matter that could have been avoided.

Missing Materials.  Despite being fully assured by my predecessor that all components were correct and present I was a little under the moon to find out that approx. 10m of handrail fixings were not accounted for but an additional 30 vertical post were present… A swift call to the manufacturer and all was well.

LESSONS LEARNTFill Complete

5 x P’s!! – Poor planning lead to several avoidable issues during construction. ie. Precast L-Units requiring core drilling (5 x 100mm Ø holes) to allow for the Piezometers to pass up vertically to the surface of the walkway.

Precast Unit QA – Do not rely on consistent geometry of precast unit in planning.

Each of the precast L-Units has 2 x preinstalled ferrules.  These provided a metric thread fixing point in precast concrete panels to which the permanent handrail will be installed.  Due to the lack of conformity in the geometry of the precast units, the horizontal alignment of all the ferrules once all of the L-units was far from straight (even by Aussy standards).  The final handrail would have looked terrible.  As such the decision was made to drill and install new ferrules in order to achieve an aesthetically pleasing handrail alignment.  See final alignment above.

Check and Double Check material quantities!!

Reo Bar Chairs – Ordered 1000 x 45mm plastic bar chairs to sit on the uneven 4B material.  Thought to be too many but required more 75% way through bay construction.  Underestimated spacing required due to uneven 4B material…

Bolts and Ferrules. To determine the bolt length that was required for a pre-installed ferrule which is not detailed on the drawings, do not simply measure the ferrule depth using a steel rod (who would do that?..).  As the base of the ferrule is rounded, the depth that a bolt can actually penetrate is approx. 5-10mm less than the full ferrule depth.  If a bolt then protrudes greater than required the handrail baseplate will be loose (apparently..).

EPSON MFP image

EPSON MFP image

OTHER NEWS..

New Chaffey Dam Site Office resident fancies a brew!

Spider

Categories: Uncategorized
  1. 09/11/2015 at 2:44 pm

    Dan , it would be good to know what the piezometers are monitoring. I would guiess the pore pressures in the up stream face of the reiforced earth fill?
    I am also guessing that the mutli piexos coming to the three location are not all reading differeing locations but are redundancy that is normally built into a geo technical monitoring scheme?

  2. Richard Farmer's avatar
    Richard Farmer
    11/11/2015 at 8:48 am

    Thanks for the update. I’d not worry about additional sealant at the salb/wall junction – sealant will give up long before the wall but the gap will be filled with miscellanous dust and debris anyway. The greater challenge is tha the slab has only a 1% fall which with any irregularity on construction, settlement in the fill or movement of the wall, will soon create a ponding and thefore icing hazard (I know its sunny now but you do get ice there in winter don’t you?). I also notice that the photo of the handrail base shows the solution I would have execed to fixing i.e. depth of ferule is irrelvant if you use thresaaded rod and a top nut. I guess the piezzos are set at different depths in the upstream face?

  1. No trackbacks yet.

Leave a comment