Home > Uncategorized > We have a bridge!

We have a bridge!

This week has by far been the most enjoyable and rewarding since arriving on the project as within 3 days the site now looks like a bridge – a somewhat unfinished bridge but we are now technically bridging one side to the other. At the start of day 1 of the lift programme I thought it was going to be one of the worst weeks so far as the 220T crane arrived on site 2 hrs before we were expecting the first delivery but when I asked to inspect the lifting gear in accordance with the lift plan they did not have the correct swift lifts. As the cast in lifting points are manufactured by a company called Reid we are required to use swift lift clutches that are also manufactured by Reid due to an early lift failure incident. Their swift lifts were not but they were also so battered they had no identifiable marks or inspection tags on them so I had to stop the lift from going ahead. When talking to the crane company head offfice they then said they don’t own any swift lifts manfactured by Reid and that then would have to hire them in. The fact that they had been told about this over month ago and the point had been reiterated to them on several occassions and the fact that this particular crane company does the majority of lifts across the project suddenly highlighted that this had been previously sweeped under the carpet, until they came across the ‘by the book army bloke’ as my supervisor jokingly referred to me as. To me there was very clear direction from the Construction Manager about the use of proprietary lifting systems following on from the lifting incident earlier in the year so how this hadn’t been spotted before I don’t know. In the end we managed to find technical literature about the Reid anchor points and swift lifts regarding the tolerances and compatibility of other makes and the crane cmpany delivered suiatable swift lifts with the correct certification and we had special dispesation from the Construction Manager under the guidance of the superintendent to proceed. We finally lifted the first bean at 1330 which was about 4.5 hours late with all the other extendabale flatbeds lined up down the main road. Once we got going we managed to rig, lift and place very quickly and we positioned the 9 beams for that day by 1600 so we made some time up but this did have an effect on later delivery’s.

IMG_1975 This is not actually above my head! H&S has been followed.

IMG_1980

The pre-cast yard told me later that day we would have 10 beams coming the following morning as they had managed to get hold of an additional truck. We actually received 8 trucks has they said because we had been too slow on the first day they had other priorities and so did not have time to load the last 2. Later on the second day they called agian saying the knock on effect would be they now couldn’t deliver the final 5 beams on sat so would mon be OK. I said that mon would not be OK at all and that they were contracted to deliver the remaining beams on the saturday and any additional costs ( the crane was $8000 per day plus a $6000 call out charge) would be forwarded to them. It then all got a little ugly and they refused to deliver on principle. It transpired they were trying to save themselves a little money by using a particular haulage company over the other and due to the time lost on the first day they didn’t have time to load the final trucks on fri afternoon. If they had loaded the trucks in the correct order or gone with the other haulage company which is based locally to them in Newcastle as oposed to the other in Sydney (3 hour drive) they/we wouldn’t have had this problem. They then said that we would have to pay for them opening up their yard on a saturday to load the remaining beams which we refused as by the second day we had made the time up and the first 5 trucks had planty of time to get back to the yard to be loaded. In the end everyone calmed down as they realised it was fri afternoon and we agreed to argue about the cost after the beams have been delivered. So the fallout of last week is that the pre-cast yard (civilbuild) want to claim for their yard opening on sat which they have unofficailaly quoted as about $4000 and we will be claiming aginst the crane company for loss of working hours and possibly the yard opening costs if it is decided we have to pay. The advice of the commercial team is that this is just civilbuild getting touchey at the end of their contract as they are trying to place a number of similar claims for past work. Considering we paid them a shade under $200,000 for 22 PSC beams of dubious quality (some of the finish and height levels are terrible and noted by the clients visits during the lifts) which equals about $9000 per beam they should probably stay quiet as we could make their life very difficult and insist remedial work is carried out on alot of the beams which we may yet do.

IMG_1982

IMG_1984 Completed lifting operation.

As the beams have now all been installed there is a sense of relief as rail can now come through without us getting in each others way. For me the pressure is about to increase as the Project Engineer who’s wing I am under is being send to another project so I am to receive rapid promotion by default I think rather than ability. I will be the only engineer on the bridge and there will be a few wrap up issues for the other 3 bridges so I seem to have jumped up to a Senior Project Engineer and will report directly to the Construction Manager. This really means I need to fully understand the cost/commercail aspect of what I am doing as I will be responsible for every dollar sepnt on the bridge and will have to justify it to the construction manager every month as part of the forecast and accrual process. We are currently about $50,000 over budget when compared against the tender costs – I just need to understand whether that is good or bad!

Categories: Uncategorized
  1. coneheadjim's avatar
    coneheadjim
    17/06/2013 at 7:02 am

    Judging by the lack of compliance to the contract and standing orders on this lift, I reckon there must be more than an even chance that you can find A$50k via contractor screw ups to balance the books. It looks like JHG have been taking more than their fair share of unexpected costs on the chin.

    Jim

  2. Richard Farmer's avatar
    Richard Farmer
    17/06/2013 at 7:55 am

    Hi Jon,

    Good blog! Answer to your last rhetorical question is that clearly every dollar the wrong side of the line is bad when a company has shareholders (possibly even more so if it doesn’t!). The whole of this piece screams commercial experience if you can follow the contract, event , claim, resolution trail for the lift issues. I would suggest it is probably seperate to any quality issues, although there may be linkages that could be drawn if it is to JHGs advantage. The concept of quid pro quo is a dangrous concpet on site, letting a contractor off on one issue in the hope he will scrathc your back later is usually a means of letting him off the hook so that it becomes water under the bridge and he will then screww you down when its to his advantage because your event is history and he has a claim… If he smiles too much – worry! I guess the next TMR will concentrate on commercial and project mangement – Enjoy the promotion!

  3. painter789's avatar
    painter789
    18/06/2013 at 5:05 pm

    Jon

    Talk about promotion in the field of battle. The trouble is that you do not get more pay! How does the erection of the beams allow trains to pass under? What about items falling off the sides, or even between the beams? Are they such a tight fit? An excellent ‘what has gone on’ blog.

    regards Neil

  4. jonbainger's avatar
    jonbainger
    19/06/2013 at 12:55 am

    Not so much to allow trains although they are using a tamping machine – the line is not operational until 2016 – but lifting the beams early means we don’t have to do a much more complicated lift using a larger crane due to access issues. The alignment between the abutments will become a rail site very shortly which doesn’t mean we can’t work within the ‘danger area’ but the controls are very tight and with ballast and track to be laid would physically limit what we can achieve anyway. We have installed temporary hand rails along all edges so we can still work on top of the deck, if we drop anything we have to immediately inform the Protection Officer (PO) for the section we are in and he gives us permission to enter the rail corridor (following a brief) and he controls other work on the rail to deconflict. There should be a 15mm gap between each beam but due to varying degrees of ‘bananna effect’ the majority are flush together at some point along its length. When we seated the final beam we were about 15mm over which is not too bad considering but still out of tolerance according to the Inspection and Test Checklist (ITC).

  1. No trackbacks yet.

Leave a reply to coneheadjim Cancel reply